WSJ reports: 2016 FSBA changes to impact real estate leases

by Emily Chasan, Wall Street Journal

The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board is set to vote Wednesday on a decade-long overhaul of lease accounting rules that promises to bring as much as $2 trillion in off-balance sheet assets on to corporate books.
Once the rules are finalized, companies are likely to get a better handle on what their balance sheets might look like going forward.

Drugstores, large retailers, restaurants and supermarkets are likely to be most affected under the rules because of significant real estate leases. But lease accounting changes will also have a big impact on banks that lease space for their retail branches, airlines that lease planes and shipping and utilities companies that lease their vehicle fleets.
The FASB says its leasing overhaul aims to “clarify the definition of a lease” and “increase transparency and comparability” among companies by bringing leases on to the balance sheet, according to a meeting handout posted ahead of Wednesday’s board vote.
Companies will likely have to take a fresh look at contracts and talk to lenders about the new look of their balance sheets, if they haven’t already.
“Companies that have been anticipating these changes have found strategic opportunities to restructure the way in which their leases are negotiated in order to mitigate some of the less desirable impacts of these new standards on their financial statements,” said Marc Maiona, founder at adviser LeaseCalcs Inc.
As the WSJ’s Michael Rapoport reports, the rules will be a significant change:
Some of America’s best-known companies—names such as AT&T Inc., CVS Health Corp.and Delta Air Lines Inc.—likely will soon have to effectively boost the debt they report on their balance sheets by tens of billions of dollars. The total possible impact for all companies: as much as $2 trillion.
Within a few years, companies may have to add to their books the cost of many leases for real estate, aircraft and other items that aren’t already carried there. U.S. rule makers are set to vote Wednesday on whether to approve in principle long-awaited new rules requiring companies to make that addition, though the move wouldn’t take effect until at least 2018.
If approved, as many observers expect, that change could dramatically boost the reported leverage for retailers, restaurant chains, airlines, package-delivery companies and other companies that use leases heavily. Companies must already disclose their lease obligations, but it is done in the footnotes to their financial statements; they aren’t included in the balance-sheet numbers to which investors pay the most attention.

Write to Emily Chasan at

SIOR leaders discuss boutique commercial real estate firms

Boutiques Resilient in Face of M&As

By John Salustri | Globe Street

CHICAGO—The spate of multinational service providers gobbling up—or being gobbled up by—other multinational service providers leaves one to wonder what the smaller boutiques, the moms-and-pops of the industry, are thinking. Members of the Independent Brokers Group of the Society of Industrial and Office Realtors aren’t flinching.

Thornburgh: “There will always be a substantial place in the market for the highly skilled boutique and regional firms.”  It was an appropriate time to chat with the folks of SIOR (a Thought Leader), given that the association’s Fall World Conference is set to kick-off here on October 8. And while the consolidation trend does tip the scales of competition toward the big boys, there’s plenty to be gained from the boutiques.


“The larger firms can control the market, setting rental rates and term structure,” says Jason M. Crimmins, CCIM, SIOR, president of the Short Hills, NJ-based Blau & Berg Co. “But there are corporate users who recognize the value and local expertise that independent firms have to offer. As an independent, we bring not only our local proficiency but every other SIOR independent’s local expertise.”

That’s where the IBG comes in, he says. “The IBG has been crucial in uniting our firms, and helping us display our local market expertise while providing a global network of SIOR professionals.” In essence, he says, the IBG gives otherwise regionally restricted firms an unprecedented national reach.

Robert G. Thornburgh, SIOR, CCIM, CPM, president and CEO of Heger Industrial in Long Beach, CA, is equally philosophical about the rise of the M&A trend—and the strength of the independent broker in the face of that trend. “All businesses, large or small, are continually searching for efficiencies and developing ambitious growth plans,” he observes. “A vibrant company closely examines procedures; systems; and inevitably, its people.” As a result, he adds, there should be no surprise that consolidations are taking place. “It’s a natural part of this process.”


Crimmins: “Relationships can become a factor only when results are provided.” But that activity doesn’t change the role of “the skilled, independent niche operator. Consolidation and recent growth are certainly in part being fueled by larger corporate clients who are opting for the efficiency of a single provider,” says Thornburgh, who is director of SIOR’s Western region. “However, there will always be a substantial place in the market for the highly skilled boutique and regional firms that continually place a premium on relationships and delivering a higher level of service.”

Crimmins notes, however, that smaller firms still have to focus on the basics. “Relationships become a factor only when results are provided,” he says. “All clients ultimately focus on the bottom line. Given the proper platform to distinguish broker from broker, they would ultimately choose performance over relationships.” In the smaller firm he believes, clients are most likely to get both.

It’s the nature of the market that the mega-mergers will continue. It’s the nature of the smaller shops, to simply keep on keepin’ on, to keep their eye on that performance and those relationships. “As an independent boutique company,” says Crimmins, “all we can do is continue to make deals, develop stronger relationships with our clients and continue to get our name out there.”

Click here for link to Globe Street Article


Enjoyed Foreign Trade Zone webinar today. Facts I gleaned:

Retail apparel & consumer goods and manufacturing are leading FTZ pursuers

Caps on Merchandise Processing Fee (MPF) of $480/week

Time savings at the dock; Direct Delivery allowance, entry selectivity circumvention.

Ocean cargo more than air cargo tends to be more applicable to FTZ.

A portion of a building can be designated as an FTZ.

Unknown-5 Unknown-4

Great info on environmental risk when purchasing commercial real estate.

Buying Commercial Real Estate? Don’t Get Stuck Having to Clean Up the Mess!

Article By Gail Brown, JD, Associate Vice President, GPE Commercial Advisors

If you are considering purchasing commercial real estate, you should also consider retaining an environmental professional to survey the property. The purposes of such a survey are both to make sure you are not purchasing a contaminated asset, and to protect yourself from liability for the cost of cleanup in the event that contamination is later found.

Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), someone who purchases contaminated real estate may be liable for the cost of cleanup of that property even though he did nothing to cause the contamination and even though he did not know when he purchased the property that it was contaminated. Moreover, liability is what is referred to as “joint and several”, meaning that, if there are multiple parties responsible for cleanup (such as you as the current owner and the person or entity from whom you purchased), each one of them is responsible for 100% of the damages. Thus, if contamination is found on property you purchased, you could be responsible for 100% of the cost of remediation and your only remedy will be to sue the seller for contribution. If the seller cannot be found or is insolvent, you are up the creek without a paddle.
Under CERCLA, there is a defense against liability for persons determined to be “innocent landowners.” In order to be found to be an innocent landowner, you must show that the contamination occurred prior to the time you purchased the property, that you performed “all appropriate inquiries” prior to purchasing, and that you did not know or have reason to know of the contamination.
Often, the type of survey obtained and the depth of the investigation is lender driven; that is, if you are obtaining a loan for the purchase of the property, the lender will specify what type of investigation it requires. Its decision is based on ensuring that its collateral has value, not protecting the borrower from liability.
In limited situations, the bank may require nothing more than a Transaction Screen Process. Transaction Screen’s are becoming more and more rare but may still be accepted by some banks if, for example, the loan amount is small and the property is at low risk for environmental contamination, such as native land in an area the bank believes has not been previously developed. A Transaction Screen consists of limited historical research and government record review, a site inspection and a Transaction Screen questionnaire that is completed by the property owner and occupant. It is often conducted by an environmental professional but, unlike a Phase I environmental survey, can be conducted by anyone, including the bank, a property owner or a broker. A Transaction Screen Process offers no protection against CERCLA liability.

In most situations, the bank will require that a Phase I environmental survey be conducted by an environmental professional. During a Phase I, no soil, groundwater or building materials sampling or analysis is done. Completion of a Phase I involves four-steps. First, the examiner will conduct interviews of the current owner and tenant, and adjacent property occupants, to determine how the subject property was used and what contaminants may have been present on or near the property. Second, the investigator will do an on-site inspection to look for evidence of potential contamination, such as industrial products or chemicals on the property, patched drains and noxious odors. The third step in a Phase I survey involves historical research. During this stage, there are several sources the examiner will consult, including: Sanborn fire-insurance maps, produced from 1866 to 1963 to identify fire insurance risk factors in buildings in certain urban areas of U.S. cities;historical aerial photography to determine prior uses of the site and nearby property; local building and fire departments to determine what historical building and underground storage tank permits have been issued; and, hydrological, topographical and geological data to evaluate the risk of migration of contaminants from nearby areas through the soil. And finally, he will consult a reverse telephone directory to identify prior tenants of the property and thereby glean their potential uses. The final stage of a Phase I is to consult state and federal environmental databases to determine if, for example, the subject property is in the vicinity of an identified brownfield site, has been the subject of corrective action directed pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act due to hazardous waste being generated on the site, is a state or federal Superfund site, is listed on a state or national database as the site of a toxic or chemical spill or accident, or has underground storage tanks that were previously reported as leaking. In the Phase I report, the examiner will give findings and recommend whether a Phase II environmental survey should be conducted.
The purpose of a Phase II survey is to determine if contamination does in fact exist. During this inspection, the examiner will obtain representative soil samples to screen for chemical or metal contamination. In addition, there may be vapor gas sampling, surface or ground water testing, and mold, asbestos, lead based paint or radon testing.

Once it is determined that contamination exists and needs to be remediated, a Phase III will be conducted to define the vertical and lateral extent of suspected contamination and to develop and implement a remediation plan. This may include, for example, excavation of a portion of the land or cleaning of a drywell.
drumsIf there is extensive contamination, a Phase IV survey is conducted to develop a long term remediation plan. An example of contamination that would require a Phase IV survey is groundwater contamination resulting from an industrial spill or illegal dumping of contaminants. A Phase IV remediation plan may take years to implement and cleanup generally occurs until verification samples show contamination within governmentally acceptable standards.
If you would like to discuss environmental risks of your property or a property you are considering purchasing, please contact Gail Brown, JD.
Many thanks to Jay Turk, President of RAL Consulting, Inc., and Dave Madsen, President of Preferred Environmental, for the invaluable information used in the article. To view RAL Consulting’s website, click here.

Article By Gail Brown, JD, Associate Vice President, GPE Commercial Advisors

Click the link to go to the bloggers page: